Tall since well, ever, hasn’t been a great option but now more. Though 25x crises was a serious challenge. Assuming you play 2. But if you want to play tall how can we make the most out of y. How to Manage Empire Size in Stellaris. In fact it could be easier with more resources. ago. Spoken like someone who isn’t even seven feet tall! Step 1: get boxed in by superior powers. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris. It can however be pretty challenging on to get right. I prefer to use my custom made tall chair and pc table to play tall. With that being said, playing tall in Stellaris is a lot harder than you think! How, then, can you get started playing tall in this game? Keep reading to discover our comprehensive guide! Set Your Limits See moreHow to play tall? I thought the changes to unity, particularly the planetary ascension mechanic, would make it ideal for a corporate empire to play tall, so I gave it. Conventional wisdom is that playing wide is easier than playing tall, but my experience has been the opposite. It's not about having few planets - in fact you should still get as many ( properly developed!! Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. General. Just don't confuse playing a voidborne in a very small space with playing tall. If you want to play a Machine Empire with a special starting world, you could pick the origin that starts you on a Machine world. self. 3 and my solutions for it. Evokes a kind of 'hazard warning' feeling. Playing tall helps with the overwhelming amount of micro that Stellaris sometimes requires. Give me the. You can do quite well by building a few colonies on nice big planets, and using wars to establish a lot of vassals and tributaries. Enjoy your stratified society. We recommend you to use them whenever you play the game. To me, playing tall means investing resources in things that increase the efficiency of your pops, which allows you to produce roughly the. 6 put the nails in the coffin, but Tall had one patch where it was "good" and that was quickly fixed. Pre-ftl civilizations could also arise. Hi, I always play tall, up to 5 colonies, but right now I see it as dumb thing to do due to how easy it is to increase your empire sprawl limit with bureaucrats. For tall, your best bet is a megacorp. Good picks: Rapid/Slow Breeders and Nomadic/Sedentary: Getting more pops quicker. Rather there is a gradient from "more wide" to "more tall" without any hard defining point where you stop being one and become the other. You can abandon colonies by resettling the last pop to another planet, but it costs 200 influence to do so. Spreading all over the map is playing wide. Abdulijubjub Field Marshal. Method 1: Find a local AI, preferably one that is considerably more powerful, and between you and the baddies. Hi, I always play tall, up to 5 colonies, but right now I see it as dumb thing to do due to how easy it is to increase your empire sprawl limit with bureaucrats. As a result, my mineral and energy credit production is a bit stunted until later in the. i would appreciate any other tall empire build advice, not minmax but maybe with some roleplay. It’s the ignorant contrarians claiming that only playing tall should be a valid play style who are being told to screw off. #9. Galactic footprint is a common usage for "wide vs tall" so you're not wrong, but op is correct in terms of game mechanics. I would say the same happens playing tall. Make sure to grab voidborn and fill the habitats with energy pops and use the merchant enclaves to grab minerals. This mod creates a new trait that will allows both Human and AI to play “play tall”. InflationCold3591. 9K Share Save 312K views 2 years ago #Stellaris #Tutorial The first 1000. Jul 10, 2011 578 250. With the changes made in 3. 5K Online. Those people are wrong, as are you. Remember, planet growth slows when you are expanding, so a constant early game expansion slows your making use of said things. What i would really like, is to play a geographically small empire but with high population planets and systems (i believe it's possible to have pops on a space platform, but i never seen them). like clone army origin - can make some viable tall builds, but ultimately playing tall is intentionally handicapping yourself at this point (including in the 3. Go for Bio-Ascension for cloning vats. Playing tall is a strategy among others, it's not really a playstyle as it can be in some other games (well, mostly Civ5 in fact, and it's really just another word for turtling). r/Stellaris • Tall vs Wide is really an issue with a Unity not being competetive with Science. Enemies might scoff at you and only spare you because of your bigger friends. Been playing stellaris for a little bit now let’s say a couple of months and I was wondering if playing tall is worth it I’ve heard mixed opinions on the topic but if it is worth it could you all give me some tips!Well there is a method of playing 'tall'. I don't know what version you're playing, but population growth is glacial in 3. CK2 took around 8 years until the release of ck3. My favorite is fanatic militarist/authoritarian with Stratified Economy but no slavery. 3 with the elimination of admin cap. The bad news is that you start with one, and to. 5. On easy difficulties though, wide is better than tall most of the time. Wide empires have more pops. My 2 cents: tall and wide is a bit nebulous. "Tall" as compared to "wide" is generally presumed to be going really high development on a low number of cities/planets (depending on your game), rather than low development of. In Stellaris you can't colonize a planet or build a habitat without claiming a system. If you play as a non gestalt empire you can invest your influence into arcology projects for city planets. There are a few common Playstyle types and each type will face similar issues regardless of how the galaxy was created. The game design of Stellaris will always favor wide over tall. When i play these it often ends. Since you play pretty much the same if you have 50 habitats rather. I'm considering turning down habitable worlds. There is the playing tall strategy. What does this mod encompass Play Tall trait Limits Core Systems Allowed2. You'll have tall/wide elements in all empires depending on how you play, whether you're role-playing or not, whether you're playing single or multi and also your ethos and civics. Wide shouldn't be better 100% of the time. 50 habitats is still less real estate than 50 planets though. Go away from modifying Empire Size to balance them. ”. . the best ways to play tall are either: a trade empire (megacorp would be the best) because the best planet types (ecumenopolis/ring world) are the best for generating trade and trade does fully cover energy, consumer goods and unity production. This guide is incredible. After playing tall it feels really limiting to go back to wide which sucks because I get way more satisfaction from conquering large swathes of space than I do from basically playing as a fallen empire. Until now, playing “wide” and securing as much territory as possible was considered the only way to stay competitive with rival Empires. ago. However, I am interested in playing tall, since maybe this is the best strategy for me. I made a lot of mistakes and read a lot of info on the web and looked at a lot of videos but nowhere do they really teach you how to play. Thread starter Tuna Cat;. In Stellaris, some people play tall by only using a single planet, some go for a small number, like your starting 3, etc. "Playing tall" in Stellaris is always purely a roleplaying decision. A small mod that actually re-balances the Tall vs. Jun 27, 2017;. The upcoming 3. Even if we never get a way to truly play tall, we still need to fix the current pop growth model (dominated by how many worlds contribute their base 3. Tall in stellaris is weird, since planets just exist nothing really stops you from conquering some big planets, and building ecumenopolis or ringworlds. 3 is a bad idea. If you want to play a Machine Empire with a special starting world, you could pick the origin that starts you on a Machine world. Megacorp is probably my favorite thing in Stellaris. This mechanic of diminishing returns leads to two distinctly different play styles, wide and tall. Stellatis is tough. So in Stellaris this would probably be a habitat/megastructure heavy playstyle and trying to do things that give you extra districts on your planets. 2. The "3. Hello, since the Galactic Comunity came out with Federations, I been trying to get towards the frists empires that have the most Diplomatic Weight, however, my playstle are mostly playing tall, with few sectors and planets on it, and with a 1000 Star and 25 empires, it seemed that wide empires tend to have more diplomatic weight because they. For how to: watch some of montuplays newest guides regarding playing tall. The pop growth bonus in particular is also augmented by the bonuses of xenophobe, for a possible 30% base pop growth. If for Civ 5 difference between small and tall does not matter, it is fine, it is a different game. 22 Badges. There hasn't been since like 1. R5: The Alderson disk origin (added by gigastructual engineering) is a really fun game if you want to play tall. I was watching quill18's latest series on stellaris. Is there any viable way to play void devellers besides commerce-tech build P. ago. In a perfect run you would just grow large nough to start the vassalisation chain and then even shrink yourself a bit if over 100. 8 no DLC. For this approach, you'd want origins that can benefit as early as possible from. 0 changed that, claiming systems increases tech cost as well as planets, but now population doesn't increase tech cost. This mechanic takes your Colonies, Systems, Districts, Pops, and any Branch Offices you have and will give you penalties once you reach a certain point. The softcap, even under the initial 3. But i definitely struggle when it comes to playing a more aggressive empire like the Commonwealth of Man or the Determined Exterminators. It would mimick a wide play power curve, but with a tall looking empire. Pick the difficulty level that matches the challenge you want to face. Bureaucrats killed tall. Midgame though if you want to play tall, definitely transition into habitats in the systems you wish to develop. That's not the definition of Wide or Tall as per Stellaris, the actual game. Wide. Given that in civ you can win without conquering anything, a tall empire doesn't have to transition to a wide empire, but in stellaris there isn't much to do if you don't conquer people, and given the way how the research and productions currently work, playing tall is not a very valid choice unless you become boxed in very early on. They have a 100 pop max capacity and 35% bonus on specialist/ruler output. 0. After playing a couple variations of necrophage, I started organizing my thoughts to try and learn what worked best for me and why. (Not super-tall though, as in one planet, but only 8 planets and about 16 systems at present. Either that. large empire size) at present. Best. Ascensions are cool. It is how the terms have worked for the majority of games since I was paying by the minute to access the internet. 3 a LOT. You use the early bonuses to advantage early-mid game expansion and transitioning into a wide. All in all though I think this build I'm playing is more static than I like. Diplomacy options just feels like a bandaid to try and force a play style that doesn't exist. Method 1: Find a local AI, preferably one that is considerably more powerful, and between you and the baddies. Stellaris is probably the best paradox game to play tall because stellaris. The ultimate wide starting origin which is void dwellers gets called tall showing how much the community have absolutely no idea what they are talking about. This misconception revolves around playing Tall vs playing Wide. Guaranteed Special System Spawn. CelestialSegfault • 10 days ago. (So your space is tall; not your planets)The only tall builds that can be considered good right now are Void Dwellers (which is actually wide under your definition since it has lots of colonies) and the Nihilistic Acquisition raider which is a very aggressive build that is constantly a war to steal pops. r/Stellaris A chip A chipOne of the greatest concepts added to EU4 was the wide vs. playing tall or wide doesnt matter if you play in singleplayer BUT playing tall in. I believe the large consensus among Stellaris players who pay attention to meta is that, in 2. I play tall and use tributaries. 0. Tall vs Wide in Stellaris isn't a dichotomy, but rather a spectrum from one extreme to the other. One last tip about resettling pops to take ruler jobs: with slaver guilds, you may have to resettle 3 pops total to fill 2 ruler jobs on a newly conquered planet. Also, I have never played with catalytic treatment. Go fanatic xenophile. Its the eternal question that decides how you’re going to play your game of stellaris and what you early strategy is going to be. And my understanding of it (as of everything else) shifts a bit all the time, so. You can do this by either vassalizing or stacking minus empire size modifiers. 130K views 5 years ago. That's enough to fight 25x in 2300. Forcing it to inevitably conquer them as time goes on No it doesn't. In Civ 4, which is an actual 4x game unlike Stellaris, playing "tall" is viable. Unlike Civ, in Stellaris "tall" isn't about same output from fewer (but more developed) planets. The first 1000 people who click the link will get 2 free months of Skillshare Premium: Playing Tall has always been one of the more elu. I explored my immediate area, only went after systems that were "behind" chokepoints (from an outside perspective), and tried to get the basic strategic resources (motes. Hey guys, I'm not very good at this game, i played 3 times on ensign now and i have not really become more powerful than other civilizations. Tall empires. 400 stars is a good balance between the extreme crowding of tiny where you are guaranteed 100% constant war, and medium where. I'd argue no, due to the nature of population growth and the general lack of bonuses for small empires. Then set your fully enslaved, indentured servitude species to social welfare for the best stability and production/upkeep efficiency. Today I have the first new basic build in a while. It is great for high difficulties because you don’t have to attack the really powerful empires and can get them to pathetic by mid to late game. #1. 7. walter. If you play at higher difficulties, then it’s supposed to be hard. Since colony ships wasn't researched at the start, I. 2. Report. The "3. There's 2 ways to play Stellaris. But the tall/wide distinction isn’t all that meaningful in Stellaris — you’re still managing more worlds and taking up more empire size, just in a smaller geographical space. Every game I'm like "okay in gonna find the nearest choke points and play tall" and never actually do unless I get boxed in. Welcome to the patricians way to play Stellaris. So today we're going to take a look at a general overview of. but what tall is or isn't is another debate I suppose and I didn't feel confident in getting any points across without using the terminology. 0, is quite annoying due to the new pop cap for large empires. It’s not a case of habitats being bad for robots, it’s more that their 100% habitability on all planets goes against the tall playstyle. All strategies assume you are trying to get maximum pops & maximum jobs on every planet. Hi, I always play tall, up to 5 colonies, but right now I see it as dumb thing to do due to how easy it is to increase your empire sprawl limit with bureaucrats. 3 comments. Try to expand early if you are playing wide (owning lots of systems) so you don't get cut off by other empires. It's a playstyle meant for defense and not offense. Pick Aptitude as your first tradition to get +1 trait. In 5 hours I will play Stellaris with my friends. In Stellaris tall is an RP/aesthetic/laziness based preference, not a strategy for optimizing a win, for all the reasons people have posted. . I’m just worried how long it’ll hold an attack back later (I’ve already fought a war to a draw by throwing them back 4. Tall doesn't mean you can't expand. On top of that bio trophies will count towards your pop cap, so if you don't play super tall your essentially short 100 robo pops compared to another machine empire. growing pops requires going wide and in stellaris pops are everything. I recently abandoned a game where I was a spiritualist empire, because I started in a location where I was boxed in by two friendly spiritualist empires. These changes will force players to decide whether to focus on fully developing what little. I am enjoying playing "Tall" and focusing on tech, planets etc. If you don't have to fight anyone for that space, it's free space, take it. Driven Assimilators are some of the easiest robot empires to play. As tall you need one. Enjoy your stratified society. Wide was nerfed, but it's still "better" than Tall. WebShaman • 6 yr. Here is what I have to report back: -This mod is very impressive and proves a greater challenge than Glavius mod by far. But the real mechanic at play with Tall vs. Well it depends. It is what gives you access to resources, it is what you use to claim territory. Even though there are many reasons why players might want to play tall, Stellaris indeed lacks functionalities that provide incentives for tall play (unless you count the negative incentive of planet & pop management). 3 comments. 2 I would venture to say the consensus is wide game play is going over the administration cap and tall is staying under it. How to play tall in stellaris: Switch your game version in the steam launcher to something from 30 years ago before admin cap jobs were added. This is going to be my updated take on the basic builds. 8 Archetype Play-stylespared to read, better leave. Everyone is talking about “playing tall” but what does that actually mean in Stellaris? Are we all on the same page about what it means?. DoeCommaJohn. The Modding Den is a server dedicated to Stellaris Modding invite to our discord server. When I look at some people's screenshots here, I see that some have naval caps in the 300's and 400's at the same time as I'm playing (early 24th century). Add a Comment. Origin varies but Gaia, voidborn and the ever broken ring world start works well. With wide you need a ton of governors, and must be replace them constantly. Playing Tall is a very special type of empire. Play fanatic pacifist,Use megacorp only in early game,After 3rd civic slot,Convert to democracy,Use Functional Architecture,Beacon of Liberty,Meritocracy. Technically voidborn in a very small space is playing wide, in a very small space. Ecumenopolis helps immensly, as does subjugating half the galaxy for the energy credits. Weekly PSA: Habitat spam is the definition of playing wide. that's the cure. And orbital habitats rule. Playing tall is using the minimal amount of worlds, rather then the minimal amount of systems. I've taken the society tech for a 10% naval capacity increase once or twice. Play tall on the short term, get bio ascension, make sturdy and strong pops, then start a conquering spree. Often multiple playstyles apply and synergize. Megastructures aren't the only way to succeed when playing tall. Megacorp fits very neatly for tall empires, given trade's (somewhat) reduced reliance on planets and pops, and their penalty to empire size. You can play tall empires by taking tributaries and vassals, its fully possible to only have a few planets while "owning" half the galaxy through your subjects. ago. Yes, even when playing wide you still try to play as tall as possible but you first focus on expansion. Which in itself may or may not be desired. It gets in my way of actually being able to play. With the Hegemon, you will get 2 AI-powered allies who will do whatever you wish early into. 7) ASpec 195K subscribers Join Subscribe 6. 3 and my solutions for it. If you want to be able to play Tall, play Endless Legend. Part 1 is intended for beginners and explains the basics of roleplaying as well as how to integrate it into your games. Step 1. . 6. Yup. That is, you stay small for some time so you can: - focus on science. but a bunch of people would scream bloody murder about how they “nerfed” wide play styles so I doubt it will happen. A "tall" empire's colonies aren't going to be much stronger or more populated than a wide empire's colonies. 13. 3 beta). Stellaris has an abstraction for Tall vs Wide in-game: the Empire Size mechanic. In reality it would be just the same wide play, just with fewer systems. For Stellaris I tend to prefer the term "Dense" as in few systems, but densely populated with habitats. The tall vs wide playstyle has devolved from: tall (low systems low planets) vs wide (many systems many planets) to a new style of tall (low systems many planets/Habs) vs wide as it was before. hirtes Mar 29, 2020 @ 6:30am. Since tall isn't a particularly viable long-term strategy, however, skipping those structures and investing the resources into widening your empire is likely more optimal. You got two species that started (a robot and cyborgs), and you needed land on the hostile worlds (aka primitives or enemy empires worlds) with ground armies, Assimilate the pops then you basically have a new world under your name. 48. building tall is more of an opening strategy, not a long term playstyle. Bribe them, then submit to vassalisation. If you stick to 10 systems and spam a bunch of habitats you are playing tall. There are a few common Playstyle types and each type will face similar issues regardless of how the galaxy was created. Playing tall in Stellaris has always been a mean and not an end. Stellaris "Tall" mainly means getting as much resources as possible out of a small(er) space. others will catch up sooner or later. But it doesn't. I believe this is OPS's most valuable asset. That doesn't mean a low amount of colonies; in fact, often more. Megacorps are a solid empire-type. I'm crushing on tall on hardest on my current game, dominant by the 2300's, overwhelming by 2400. I could just settle and terraform more planets to make more stations, but that is a long term and expensive process. Okay, first things first, if. Beginner's guide to Stellaris. This guide was made for basic Stellaris Version Adams 1. So for Tall vs Wide in Stellaris, your start location matters a lot more than your empire build. One of the biggest changes is the name change from Empire Sprawl. After a while, re-change your pops so that those on habitats get great specialist traits and those on planets get good worker traits. Yes, and this is not Civ 5, this Stellaris. Pacifism also allows the player to pick an exceptionally powerful Civic, Inward Perfection. ago. This ironically makes the Expansion tradition really good for tall builds, since it gives bonuses to both Admin cap and pop growth speed. Tall empires. Your main species is fine for gaia worlds and relic worlds, but anything else will require a different species. If you happen to trigger a certain precursor, but then the areas where their events can spawn end up occupied by other empires, you can be left with 0/6 hints. you can gain a significant advantage in tech and traditions by focussing on a small number of large, well developed worlds. I've always preferred playing tall in 4x games and was wondering if there is any effective strategy for playing tall in this game. We have another 2. There is the playing tall strategy. It doesn't work in Stellaris (at least in 3. Lots, and lots of resources. When I play tall, and only conquer like 10-12 systems, and find good chokepoints, and focus on tech and development on my worlds, I end up with 100s of each resource per month, and by midgame every non-FE empire is 'inferior' to me. Imo the best definition of play wide is a lot of systems. There is a heatmap for that out there on the internet. Darvin3 • 1 yr. Wide strategies focus on having lots of cities and territory, often with each city having minimal upgrades. Empire size has changed a lot over the years in Stellaris. Sadly, space gnomes have not been confirmed, so we'll probably be forced to play tall. Tall since well, ever, hasn’t been a great option but now more. Build Starbase at choke points, not on all outposts. Things have changed now, and playing tall is far from the powerhouse strategy it once was. ago The_Godfather69 The Definitive Guide For "How To Play Tall" In Stellaris Console Edition Video This video is my Guide for: How to Play Tall in Stellaris Console. • 2 yr. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. NB: this is system not planet. Way, Way, WAAAY Too Many Thoughts on Necrophage (Strategy, Synergy, etc. You get more yeild from the planet as far as resources plus more space for research labs. Tall is restricting yourself to playing with fewer colonies and avoiding outward expansion. However since few systems with a lot of planets/habitats pretty much are the same mechanically I do not consider it playong tall. It is clear, that Stellaris tries it. Especially if you've been away for 1-2 years. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. If you want you can call this "its dead", but as long some people write a guide, there is a way to play tall. Sure, a 1000-pop tall empire with 25 planets/habitats isn’t big by Stellaris standards, but that’s still 500 billion people. 8. That require you to explore and have them in your territory. For example, a well-placed machine uprising could kill the galactic emperor and end the imperium, or a rebellion could end up vassalizing its parent state, and forming its own bloc. The game actually requires a heavy amount of micromanagement, sectors or not. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by Paradox Development Studio. You will be slightly less ahead, as the AI here is much better at tech, but still a massive lead. tall mechanism, so you are not forced to conquer new territories to become stronger. If you get stuck with it, ignore this step. Tips on playing wide? So i am trying to play more wide and less tall but i seem to have a problem. For example the governors, and the space station. Originally posted by twistedmelon: Tall is still a strategy, but it is more grey. . Low empire size penalties. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but people who play tall are "wrong". Even “playing tall” can benefit from this pick early since 30 administrative capacity is nothing and the +20 essentially translates into faster research and tradition. 8K 89K views 4 weeks ago Stellaris Tall Build Guide. This includes systems such as the Sanctuary ringworld system, the system with the planet Zanaam and any special systems in the DLC (if you have the appropriate DLC). Add a Comment. 87 Badges. Enslaving conquered populations is tricky and requires a lot of pop shuffling. We have "wide with many systems" and "wide with few systems, but those systems contain thirty billion habitats". also if you're mass vassalizing that's not really tall play, that's just playing wide with extra steps. This is the truth. all right. They would be also wrong. Stellaris is a game I fall in and out of love with every few months and one of this games biggest flaws and probably what stops me from playing it regularly is having to micromanage 50+ planets every few minutes to build homes and create jobs. I played Stellaris after the release, but that is long time ago and since EU4 became "RTS grand strategy with historical flavour, too streamlined mission trees for some countries and way too RNG-dependent in some cases", I would like to give Stellaris a shot. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement. My idea was to play domination and build out solid core worlds and maybe a small sector with very strong defense and then go out and subjugate the other empires. You can play a faction which only ever has 1 city, but everything is concentrated in this one city. . Shipsets were reptilian. large number of poorly developed planets. But it’s basicaly giving yourself a handicap for little to no reason. Ascendant clones get crazy huge specialist bonuses, so what you want to do is pack them into forge and factory worlds. Do it from system view. Base habitat, with the size modifier, will have maybe half population growth from size penalties. Some used one planet. Best. Friendly-General-723 Collective Consciousness 8 mo. Super OP Tall Build. To combat sprawl, if you have the overlord DLC, you can claim these systems but then release the sector as a vassal. Intro Stellaris Tall Guide Montu Plays 130K subscribers Subscribe Subscribed 3. Which requires lots of claimed stars and colonized planets. After that take the angler civic, agrarian idyll and when you get the third one take catalytic converter as thats key to the whole build. The player "developed" these systems to the heights of their abilities, using Habitats and Ringworlds. And in a game about choice the choice to play Tall or Wide should actually matter. Basically a tall playstyle is ignoring 4x and GSG conventions. 100% habitability is nice for migration treaties with other species that have desirable traits, and increases the chances of refugees in the lategame for more pop growth. Good tall player should get atleast 15 habitats in 2230,Synthetic Evolution before 2260. R5: I just love having vassals and building a hegemony over conquest. Playing tall finally is viable and I don't feel forced to expand non-stop without trade-offs. #7. Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. 2. But you're right. Machine, Hive Mind, Megacorp, Regular - Which are best for Tall play and which for Wide play?. It doesn't work in Stellaris (at least in 3. I can also use influence to grow taller by activating an edict, making my. .